541 research outputs found

    Genome sequences reveal global dispersal routes and suggest convergent genetic adaptations in seahorse evolution

    Get PDF
    Seahorses have a circum-global distribution in tropical to temperate coastal waters. Yet, seahorses show many adaptations for a sedentary, cryptic lifestyle: they require specific habitats, such as seagrass, kelp or coral reefs, lack pelvic and caudal fins, and give birth to directly developed offspring without pronounced pelagic larval stage, rendering long-range dispersal by conventional means inefficient. Here we investigate seahorses’ worldwide dispersal and biogeographic patterns based on a de novo genome assembly of Hippocampus erectus as well as 358 re-sequenced genomes from 21 species. Seahorses evolved in the late Oligocene and subsequent circum-global colonization routes are identified and linked to changing dynamics in ocean currents and paleo-temporal seaway openings. Furthermore, the genetic basis of the recurring “bony spines” adaptive phenotype is linked to independent substitutions in a key developmental gene. Analyses thus suggest that rafting via ocean currents compensates for poor dispersal and rapid adaptation facilitates colonizing new habitats.Fil: Chunyan, Li. Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory; China. Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology; China. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de ChinaFil: Olave, Melisa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas; Argentina. University of Konstanz; AlemaniaFil: Hou, Yali. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de ChinaFil: Geng, Qi. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de China. Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory; ChinaFil: Schneider, Ralf. University Of Konstanz; Alemania. Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kie; AlemaniaFil: Zeixa, Gao. Huazhong Agricultural University; ChinaFil: Xiaolong, Tu. Allwegene Technologies ; ChinaFil: Xin, Wang. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de ChinaFil: Furong, Qi. China National Center for Bioinformation; China. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; ChinaFil: Nater, Alexander. University of Konstanz; AlemaniaFil: Kautt, Andreas F.. University of Konstanz; Alemania. Harvard University; Estados UnidosFil: Wan, Shiming. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de ChinaFil: Yanhong, Zhang. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de ChinaFil: Yali, Liu. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de ChinaFil: Huixian, Zhang. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de ChinaFil: Bo, Zhang. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de ChinaFil: Hao, Zhang. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de ChinaFil: Meng, Qu ,. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de ChinaFil: Shuaishuai, Liu. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de ChinaFil: Zeyu, Chen. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de China. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; ChinaFil: Zhong, Jia. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de ChinaFil: Zhang, He. BGI-Shenzhen; ChinaFil: Meng, Lingfeng. BGI-Shenzhen; ChinaFil: Wang, Kai. Ludong University; ChinaFil: Yin, Jianping. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de ChinaFil: Huang, Liangmin. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de China. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; ChinaFil: Venkatesh, Byrappa. Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology; SingapurFil: Meyer, Axel. University of Konstanz; AlemaniaFil: Lu, Xuemei. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de ChinaFil: Lin, Qiang. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de China. Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory; China. Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology; China. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; Chin

    Long-range angular correlations on the near and away side in p–Pb collisions at

    Get PDF

    Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Get PDF
    In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. For example, a key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process versus those that measure fl ux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process including the amount and rate of cargo sequestered and degraded). In particular, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation must be differentiated from stimuli that increase autophagic activity, defi ned as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (inmost higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium ) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the fi eld understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. It is worth emphasizing here that lysosomal digestion is a stage of autophagy and evaluating its competence is a crucial part of the evaluation of autophagic flux, or complete autophagy. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. Along these lines, because of the potential for pleiotropic effects due to blocking autophagy through genetic manipulation it is imperative to delete or knock down more than one autophagy-related gene. In addition, some individual Atg proteins, or groups of proteins, are involved in other cellular pathways so not all Atg proteins can be used as a specific marker for an autophagic process. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field

    Underlying Event measurements in pp collisions at s=0.9 \sqrt {s} = 0.9 and 7 TeV with the ALICE experiment at the LHC

    Full text link

    Molecular Dynamics Study of Interfacial Micromechanical Behaviors of 6H-SiC/Al Composites under Uniaxial Tensile Deformation

    No full text
    This paper investigated the micromechanical behavior of different 6H-SiC/Al systems during the uniaxial tensile loading by using molecular dynamics simulations. The results showed that the interface models responded diversely to the tensile stress when the four low-index surfaces of the Al were used as the variables of the joint surfaces. In terms of their stress–strain properties, the SiC(0001)/Al(001) models exhibited the highest tensile strength and the smallest elongation, while the other models produced certain deformations to relieve the excessive strain, thus increasing the elongation. The SiC(0001)/Al(110) models exhibited the largest elongations among all the models. From the aspect of their deformation characteristics, the SiC(0001)/Al(001) model performed almost no plastic deformation and dislocations during the tensile process. The deformation of the SiC(0001)/Al(110) model was dominated by the slip of the 1/6 <112> Shockley partial dislocations, which contributed to the intersecting stacking faults in the model. The SiC(0001)/Al(111) model produced a large number of dislocations under the tensile loading. Dislocation entanglement was also found in the model. Meanwhile, a unique defect structure consisting of three 1/6 <110> stair-rod dislocations and three stacking faults were found in the model. The plastic deformation in the SiC(0001)/Al(112) interface model was restricted by the L-C lock and was carried out along the 1/6 <110> stair-rod dislocations’ direction. These results reveal the interfacial micromechanical behaviors of the 6H-SiC/Al composites and demonstrate the complexity of the deformation systems of the interfaces under stress

    Molecular Dynamics Study of Interfacial Micromechanical Behaviors of 6H-SiC/Al Composites under Uniaxial Tensile Deformation

    No full text
    This paper investigated the micromechanical behavior of different 6H-SiC/Al systems during the uniaxial tensile loading by using molecular dynamics simulations. The results showed that the interface models responded diversely to the tensile stress when the four low-index surfaces of the Al were used as the variables of the joint surfaces. In terms of their stress–strain properties, the SiC(0001)/Al(001) models exhibited the highest tensile strength and the smallest elongation, while the other models produced certain deformations to relieve the excessive strain, thus increasing the elongation. The SiC(0001)/Al(110) models exhibited the largest elongations among all the models. From the aspect of their deformation characteristics, the SiC(0001)/Al(001) model performed almost no plastic deformation and dislocations during the tensile process. The deformation of the SiC(0001)/Al(110) model was dominated by the slip of the 1/6 Shockley partial dislocations, which contributed to the intersecting stacking faults in the model. The SiC(0001)/Al(111) model produced a large number of dislocations under the tensile loading. Dislocation entanglement was also found in the model. Meanwhile, a unique defect structure consisting of three 1/6 stair-rod dislocations and three stacking faults were found in the model. The plastic deformation in the SiC(0001)/Al(112) interface model was restricted by the L-C lock and was carried out along the 1/6 stair-rod dislocations’ direction. These results reveal the interfacial micromechanical behaviors of the 6H-SiC/Al composites and demonstrate the complexity of the deformation systems of the interfaces under stress

    Deep learning assisted sparse array ultrasound imaging.

    No full text
    This study aims to restore grating lobe artifacts and improve the image resolution of sparse array ultrasonography via a deep learning predictive model. A deep learning assisted sparse array was developed using only 64 or 16 channels out of the 128 channels in which the pitch is two or eight times the original array. The deep learning assisted sparse array imaging system was demonstrated on ex vivo porcine teeth. 64- and 16-channel sparse array images were used as the input and corresponding 128-channel dense array images were used as the ground truth. The structural similarity index measure, mean squared error, and peak signal-to-noise ratio of predicted images improved significantly (p < 0.0001). The resolution of predicted images presented close values to ground truth images (0.18 mm and 0.15 mm versus 0.15 mm). The gingival thickness measurement showed a high level of agreement between the predicted sparse array images and the ground truth images, as indicated with a bias of -0.01 mm and 0.02 mm for the 64- and 16-channel predicted images, respectively, and a Pearson's r = 0.99 (p < 0.0001) for both. The gingival thickness bias measured by deep learning assisted sparse array imaging and clinical probing needle was found to be <0.05 mm. Additionally, the deep learning model showed capability of generalization. To conclude, the deep learning assisted sparse array can reconstruct high-resolution ultrasound image using only 16 channels of 128 channels. The deep learning model performed generalization capability for the 64-channel array, while the 16-channel array generalization would require further optimization
    corecore